Rebuttal of Lies Posted on a Ripoff Report

Report: #1167127

Complaint Review: International Animal Rescue Foundation, Animal Buddy, SayNotodogmeat.net/ Michele Brown, John Williamson, Amber Donoghue

AUDIO 1

AUDIO 2

I have decided to republish these recordings, fortuitously saved in my library from the YouTube publication, because among the many other lies in the ripoff report, named above, is the following accusation that is long overdue in being addressed.

THE FALSE ACCUSATION POSTED ON THE RIPOFF REPORT:

“2014 John Williamson harassed the No To Dog Meat CEO Julia Cadenet with early morning/late night phone calls. While doing this he recorded her without her knowledge and his friend altered the conversation to make Julia appear suspect. The videos were however taken down from youtube.

If you have listened to those clips, then know this, John Williamson did not put the whole conversation up, and because of this people have turned against No To Dog Meat. Without knowing the full truth of what led to certain things being said.

We believe John gave the audio to Amber Donoghue for her to alter, as she has experience in Photoshop and audio due to her expertise in marketing for the xxx in Sussex. Where she makes advertisements, audio and digital graphics.”

Amber has been falsely accused of editing the recordings; she had no knowledge of them until she heard them on YouTube. Her job does not include audio work and she has no experience of ever editing recording clips. The writer of the blog, Mary Robbins (of Walker, Trinity, Texas – https://www.facebook.com/BeyondTheRobbinsPlane) simply made it up to implicate Amber in a bogus association. For the record, Amber has no affiliation whatsoever with IARF, NTDM, or SNTDM. Incidentally, Mary Robbins has been writing numerous malicious blogs about Amber since October 2013. More on that subject later. Now, since the writer of the defamatory report has publicly ‘opened the door’ to these recordings, the public should have the opportunity of judging for themselves if they believe they could have been edited to put words into Ms De Cadenet’s mouth. I have therefore decided to republish them. The writer of the report is in no doubt as to the identity of the woman, she is in fact a close friend of hers and was the official blogger for the No To Dog Meat charity, but she seems to believe that ‘Jose’, the man talking to Julia de Cadenet, is Jon W.

NB The woman is heard quite clearly in one of the recordings begging Jose to record her words.

The Dirty Tricks Campaign Continues & Another ARA FB Bites the Dust. RIP ‘Onto Dog Team’

June 6, 2014 ~ Who is No To Dog Meat

RECENTLY REPORTED ON FACEBOOK (copied here with permission from the author of the FB timeline post) :

“Is the FB animal charity working overtime to conceal the latest scandal published about their CEO? Sad to note that the latest casualty in a dirty tricks campaign is the popular and dedicated to animal welfare FB page ‘Onto Dog Team’.

Anybody who has supported or read the Onto Dog Team page knows that the admin give monthly grants from their own pockets to small animal shelters. Worth noting that the OTDT admin have donated personal grants of thousands of dollars in the last year for animals compared to only one grant of 300 euros (raised in an Xmas raffle) given by this now infamous charity purporting to be dedicated to fighting the trade in cats and dogs for meat and fur. So why was this tiny grant not given to rescuers of dogs from the dog meat trade but strangely to a Romanian shelter? Could it possibly be that they requested in return photos of the Romanian beneficiaries wearing their logo t shirts?

OTDT have often lightened our days on FB with their pithy posts and hilarious satirical pics. My all time favorite Onto Dog Team pic is supposed to be me depicted as the phantom hacker (I have foolishly been accused of being) attacking the charity.

ONTO DOG TEAM Satirical Skit of Supposed Hacker Tracked Down In Deepest France

So yet again a valuable animal advocate page falls foul of offending the ‘not so tender’ sensibilities of Mme CEO and her cohorts, who are quite simply only interested in promoting her personally as a public figure. Shame on the people who are now scrambling to hide the evidence by getting FB pages taken down in the forlorn hope that they will one day bask in the warm glow of her gratuitous glory seeking.

The Onto Dog Team admin were also a guiding light in researching genuine rescues, having been severely financially bitten by the above mentioned charity. We knew that their choices for grants were to be trusted and were encouraged to put our own hands in our pockets for their selected recipient of funds.The animal welfare community have sadly lost a genuine animal advocate FB page.”

Was this Pic Skit a prediction from ONTO DOG TEAM?

Animal ‘Charity’ Dirty Tricks Campaign Part 3

Featured ~ Who is No To Dog Meat

Amended & updated 17th Oct 2013

To follow this blog you will need to read Part 1 & Part 2

You will have read at the end of Part 2 that, ‘Notodogmeat’ had given up pretending that their FB Page was hacked. In a shocking statement their CEO was blamed for threatening and defamatory posts made on their official Facebook Page. They reported that the CEO was intoxicated when she made the posts. These posts are reproduced in Part 2 and are predominantly directed at Mr Peter Egan, a much admired actor, public figure and well-known animal rights activist. After that statement we waited for the other shoe to drop. We didn’t have long to wait.

(click onto images to view)

Having made that quite incoherent threat to Ms de Cadenet, the admin now in control of the Facebook Page decided to invent an official investigative body called EAD. The post they made on their FB page is very long so we include these screen grabs to give you a flavour of how bizarre this post was.

This was disconcerting; had the inmates taken over the asylum? However, we did not at that time know who the inmates were. We did notice that there was certainly an attempt to sanitize Ms Brown, a co-founder and trustee of notodogmeat.

If you wish to read the entire, practically incomprehensible post, you can view it here, you will need to click the image once it has loaded to enlarge it and read the text:

After this manic attempt to blacken the name of Ms de Cadenet, and/or suggest that she really did not exist at all (see section 9, it was incredibly confusing) the official Facebook Page of NTDM was suddenly deactivated.

Just when we were beginning to hope that their illiterate rhetoric had caused them to spontaneously implode, we received news that ‘NTDM’ had returned to Facebook. It was puzzling to see that the Page we were now viewing had been stripped of its 6000+ ‘likes’ and had very little content. It became apparent that this was not a resurrection but a brand new Page The inmates appeared to have lost control of the old asylum (Page currently deactivated) and Ms de Cadenet was now reclaiming the NTDM identity.

The new NTDM page opened a forum of comments. Needless to say the comments were often less than polite. Ms de Cadenet (if it was her) fielded the questions and comments until October 2nd when it was reported that “All questions and comments have now gone before our moderator and legal advisor Ms J de Cadenet, who has full authority to speak on behalf of NoToDogMeat and our charity.”

So who are the people in control of the new NTDM official Facebook Page? And who are the people who took control of the original NTDM official Facebook Page? Who is the person that Ms de Cadenet refers to when stating the new Page “replaces the pages stolen by a known criminal on 23rd September”?

Click the image once it has loaded to enlarge it and read the text

So there we have the current state of play. Sadly still more questions rather than answers.

On the basis that absolutely everything surrounding NTDM appears to be suspect, we cannot discount that this could be a double bluff campaign. The scenario, currently presented, is that the new NTDM official FB page is de Cadenet, Merrill & Hughes, and that the old FB page was commandeered by Brown & ‘Craash Beck’ with the help of a previously unidentified interloper. It appears that there is now fierce competition for domination of NTDM. Such intensity for control of the NTDM branding saw a small FB page reported for using the words ‘NoToDogMeat’ in its banner image. The little known FB page this happened to was purely set up to counteract NTDM re-entering the Australian FB arena. The images attached refer to the claimed ‘intellectual property rights’. Make of that what you will.

IF the current revelations are to be believed, there are now two clearly defined opposing sides competing for control of NTDM, with the ‘interloper’ accused of being directly involved in sabotaging the original official FB NTDM Page. Was the ‘interloper’ the person deployed to ‘hack’ as per Brown’s recent blog (second screen shot on that page)? Is this a falling out of conspirators or is someone manipulating NTDM in the shadows, hidden behind Brown & ‘Craash Beck’ of the Facebook Page ‘Don’t Let Them Eat Me’ ?

NTDM designate ‘NoToDogMeat’ as the ‘acronym’ for The World Protection of Dogs and Cats in the Meat Trade in their application for NGO consultative status. We do not know at this point if their application will prove successful?

Ms de Cadenet and Mr Merrill, as appointed officers of this company, are surely responsible for the legal and charitable status reports previously supplied to their supporters and donors. Ms Brown was appointed as a director of this company on the 10 Aug 2013 and only served just over a month as an officer until 20 Sep 2013. One thing is certain, Ms de Cadenet & Mr Merrill are the two people accountable for the management of the charitable funds raised.

We have absolutely no idea what the above screen shot of donations refers to, certainly not to any money passing through the coffers of The World Protection For Dogs And Cats In The Meat Trade (WPDCMT). Why NTDM used donation details from the Animal Aid ‘Umbrella’ organisation Wetnose beggars belief. We hear that WPDCMT are awaiting confirmation of their recent application for UK Charities Commission registration so that they can apply for Gift Aid. With their own funds seemingly in chaos it is very concerning that WPDCMT, ‘Umbrella’ for NTDM, may then invite smaller animal charities to allow them to collect and allocate donations on their behalf. The attraction for charities too small to be able to register as a charity and thus claim Gift Aid status is that the umbrella charity can claim Gift Aid on their behalf for a fee of usually 4%. The trustees of an umbrella charity have ultimate control of the funds received to decide whether donations received should go to specified charities. If they decide that the charity specified as the beneficiary by the donor is a credible charity they will claim Gift Aid on the donation and pass the donation plus the Gift Aid to the donor’s chosen charity (less an agreed administration fee). Worth noting that the umbrella organisation will also receive interest on the holding funds. This scheme is a ‘win win’ concept to maximize the impact of received donations since both the umbrella organisation and the small charities are collecting money for helping animals. Where it can go horribly wrong is if the umbrella organisation is untrustworthy or incompetent. It is important to state that Wetnose is a much respected and highly endorsed UK organisation raising awareness as well as money for voiceless friends. We sincerely hope, in light of recent chaotic events surrounding WPDCMT, that they will be prevented from extending their ‘umbrella’ to offer shelter to any but their very own NTDM.

We are only able to report information as it is made available to us in the public domain. In the spirit of being even-handed we also refer you to Michele Brown’s recent statement on her website: http://chiffonriver.com/?p=1676

WPDCMT ( working name seen in the screenshot) was formally registered as a charity with the UK Charities Commission on 8th November 2013. The articles of the limited liability UK company were amended on 5th November 2013 in order to obtain charitable status for tax purposes.

Finally we report that at this time Mr. Peter Egan has not received a public apology for the scurrilous comments directed at him on both Facebook and Twitter under the name of NoToDogMeat.

We ask that you join us to monitor those who may be exploiting unwary animal lovers.

Animal ‘Charity’ Dirty Tricks Campaign Part 2

Featured ~ Who is No To Dog Meat

UPDATED 23 September 2013: For latest news scroll to bottom of this blog.

Click on images to magnify

You will recall that we reported that NTDM, bloated by their triumphant FB vendetta against their critics, decided to launch a Twitter attack on Peter Egan @PeterEgan6 , a much respected public figure in the UK. Peter Egan is a tireless animal welfare activist and the ambassador for Animals Asia. Why did NTDM launch an attack on Peter Egan? Because he said that he did not support them. Animal ‘Charity’ Dirty Tricks Campaign

Many of us watched with open mouths as the numbers of twitter followers of @notodogmeat shot up in less than 12 hours from 2k to 7k. Is it possible that they purchased a 5000 twitter followers package? Surely an animal charity wouldn’t misuse donations from their supporters in such a ridiculous fashion? Interesting to note that these thousands of new followers seemed to have nothing to do with animals in their profile. We certainly didn’t see them tweeting in support of NTDM.

NTDM, in a hissy fit, decided to carry their obnoxious campaign against their critics back to their Facebook page.

Odin Campbell is/was a fake Facebook ID used to troll and frighten critics of NTDM. A very nasty persona indeed who uses his military background in the same threatening way as Mr H. the ‘NTDM campaign manager’ used his police background in FB comments.

Below are the other, now deleted, NTDM Facebook posts from yesterday. Perhaps the celebrated ‘pro bono’ unregistered ‘Barrister’ CEO of NTDM will need to dust off her law books.

This kind of attack is commonly used by NTDM. They usually complain that they have been hacked or try to blame a nameless volunteer. Well their Twitter account must have been hacked at the same time? They obviously like the ‘ brown envelope’ reference too much to cover their tracks well enough.

We have noticed recently that this well know FB infamous personality has been vigorously defending NTDM, seems he is friendly with Mr H the campaign manager for NTDM and owner of a Philippine rescue. Some friends an animal ‘charity’ is probably better off not having. Unless of course, you need to intimidate critics.

On a final note the two women co-founders of NTDM are no slouches themselves when tweeting.

Update September 22 2013

Just in….. NTDM defend their appalling ‘Facebook Page’ attack on Mr Peter Egan and their threat to set an ex SAS thug onto critics.

As of the 22 September 2013, and following reactions to this post, the official Facebook Page of Notodogmeat has been disabled. Their twitter account was re-launched today with a thumping 2k loss of followers in spite of a package of 5k recently added . The closure of the FB page may be temporary for ‘house cleaning’ purposes?

Who are the Admin responsible for the infamous recent posts on the official Notodogmeat FB page? We are no closer to discovering the answer to that question. NTDM management seem uncertain themselves? The UK police are usually indifferent to social media threats of violence and stalking so we are not optimistic about the complaint lodged with them. We do know that this is the person who tweets for them.

We do know that this person has been part of the management team since the beginning. Observers have believed that she and Ms Brown, with the campaign manager Mr H who posts periodically under his own name, have admin roles on the official Facebook Page. This screen shot , of an interesting request to the Thailand NTDM Chapter, has just been posted on Twitter. NTDM headquarters requested that Sally is immediately appointed as joint admin and that the Thai Chapter place an order for T Shirts in order to be officially endorsed.

Before giving your money to the ‘animal charities’ which proliferate the pages of Facebook, perhaps the question to ask yourselves is: would you buy a used car from these people? Facebook is not in the least interested in monitoring their social media pages. Complaints to FB fall on deaf ears; the reverse is true…complainants with small FB audiences often find themselves very much at the mercy of bigger Pages. The FB moderators seem to have an inexplicable agenda which has nothing to do with protecting the public from nefarious people who will stop at nothing to part us from our money.

Update 23 September 2013 NTDM re-activates their official Facebook Page.

DID SHE FALL ON HER SWORD OR WAS SHE STABBED IN THE BACK?

Notodogmeat have given up pretending that their FB Page was hacked. In a shocking statement this morning, their CEO is blamed for the threatening and defamatory posts made on their official Facebook Page. They report that she was intoxicated. The statement appears to have been made by somebody to whom English is a second language. There is reference to her Korean counterpart taking control. Interesting, we had no idea that there was a Korean counterpart in the management team of Notodogmeat. Equally interesting, is that they seem to be attempting to ‘sanitize’ their self proclaimed Campaign Manager Mr H by claiming that the CEO, Ms J de C, was the Campaign Manager. The good news is that they state they are no longer a Charity and will not in future ask for donations. There is no word yet on the merchandising side of the organization. For those without a Facebook account we will keep you posted.

USA you may be pleased to know that Notodogmeat are still active on:

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Notodogmeat-USA/148241555372243

where you will be able to donate or buy merchandise, if you are so inclined.

Animal ‘Charity’ Dirty Tricks Campaign Part 1

Featured ~ Who is No To Dog Meat

NTDM and their acolytes, to silence their critics, reported them to FB as fake identities. To verify their identities, and to have their accounts reinstated, FB requested private documents as proof of identity. Some of us have refused to do so, since we do not believe that FB should be trusted with such personal information. Others have responded to FB onerous demands but still have not had their accounts reinstated? Animal welfare pages have been stranded since their admin are banned from access. Valuable work on FB for suffering animals has ground to a halt. The people who launched this attack have many false identities but we were all taken down too quickly to protect ourselves from them. We have seen FB comments chortling about their success in removing their critics from FB.
NTDM, bloated by their triumphant FB vendetta, then decided to launch a Twitter attack on Peter Egan, a much respected public figure in the UK, a tireless animal welfare activist and the ambassador for Animals Asia. Why did they launch an attack on Peter Egan? Because he said that he did not support them.

Peter was impelled to make this statement because NTDM have recently been using an old photo of him on their Facebook page and were heralding him as a supporter.

In a spiteful attempt to smear his reputation NTDM attacked him by erroneously suggesting that he is linked to an individual who had posted a derogatory comment on Facebook.

Peter Egan has a big following of supporters on Twitter. They are appalled at this attempt to smear his reputation. People, who up until now had not even known about NTDM, tweeted in protest. Until this much-loved and respected man was attacked in this way by NTDM on Twitter, they had no idea of the depths to which this ‘animal charity’ will sink to cover their traces. Peter, being the dignified man he is, responded to this vicious attack, He made a simple request.

When no response was forthcoming, on what had now become a public forum, he asked another simple question. “Who is their CEO and who are their trustees?”

NTDM refused to answer.

If you would like to read about this on Twitter, please follow the link: https://twitter.com/PeterEgan6

	lovelygirlie on Rebuttal of Lies Posted on a R…
	All Singing All Danc… on All Singing All Dancing Animal…
	BOKDAYS Film Exposed… on All Singing All Dancing Animal…
	Animal ‘Charity’ Dir… on Animal ‘Charity’ Dirty Tricks…
	Animal ‘Charit… on Animal ‘Charity’ D…

Who is No To Dog Meat?

and who is The World Protection for Dogs & Cats in the Meat Trade?

Category Archives: Animal Charity Dirty tricks

Rebuttal of Lies Posted on a Ripoff Report

Complaint Review: International Animal Rescue Foundation, Animal Buddy, SayNotodogmeat.net/ Michele Brown, John Williamson, Amber Donoghue

The Dirty Tricks Campaign Continues & Another ARA FB Bites the Dust. RIP ‘Onto Dog Team’

Animal ‘Charity’ Dirty Tricks Campaign Part 3

Animal ‘Charity’ Dirty Tricks Campaign Part 1